Marriage and its Limits

Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 67 (10):4131-4166 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Marriages come in a very wide variety: if the reports of anthropologists and historians are to be believed, an extraordinarily wide variety. This includes some of the more unusual forms, including marriage to the dead; to the gods; and even to plants. This does suggest that few proposed marriage relationships would require 'redefining marriage': but on the other hand, it makes giving a general theory of marriage challenging. So one issue we should face is how accepting we should be of the reports: to what extent reported 'marriages' really are marriages. This paper defends the view that almost all of these reported marriages are in fact marriages, and suggests some theoretical approaches that may be generous enough to account for this.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-02-08

Downloads
2,491 (#4,579)

6 months
314 (#6,805)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniel Nolan
University of Notre Dame

Citations of this work

Meaning change.Indrek Reiland - 2023 - Analytic Philosophy 65 (3):434-451.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Philosophy of Philosophy.Timothy Williamson - 2007 - Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
What is Conceptual Engineering and What Should it Be?David Chalmers - 2020 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 63.
Conceptual Ethics I.Alexis Burgess & David Plunkett - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (12):1091-1101.
Talk and Thought.Sarah Sawyer - 2019 - In Alexis Burgess, Herman Cappelen & David Plunkett (eds.), Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics. New York, USA: Oxford University Press. pp. 379-395.

View all 11 references / Add more references