Moral requirements are still not rational requirements

Analysis 59 (3):127-136 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Moral requirements apply to rational agents as such. But it is a conceptual truth that if agents are morally required to act in a certain way then we expect them to act in that way. Being rational, as such, must therefore suffice to ground our expectation that rational agents will do what they are morally required to do. But how could this be so? It could only be so if we think of the moral requirements that apply to agents as themselves categorical requirements of rationality or reason. For the only thing we can legitimately expect of rational agents as such is that they do what they are rationally required to do (Smith 1994: 85).

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,809

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
474 (#59,788)

6 months
15 (#202,868)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Noordhof
University of York

Citations of this work

Against internalism.Kieran Setiya - 2004 - Noûs 38 (2):266–298.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The moral problem.Michael R. Smith - 1994 - Cambridge, Mass., USA: Blackwell.
The possibility of altruism.Thomas Nagel - 1970 - Oxford,: Clarendon P..
Moral reasons.Jonathan Dancy - 1993 - Cambridge: Blackwell.
Virtue and Reason.John McDowell - 1979 - The Monist 62 (3):331-50.
Virtue and Reason.John McDowell - 1997 - In Roger Crisp & Michael Slote (eds.), Virtue Ethics. Oxford University Press.

View all 14 references / Add more references