Ramachandran's four counterexamples

Mind 109 (434):315-324 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Murali Ramachandran has kindly provided me with four (alleged) counterexamples to the theory of causation which I recently put forward in Mind (Ramachandran 2000; Noordhof 1999). Space is limited for a response. Since this note will be published Ramachandran's paper, I will not set out the cases he gives. I refer the reader to the appropriate descriptions. I will also presume knowledge of the framework of my paper and just give page references in case this is helpful. I will try to couch the discussion with as little reference to the technical apparatus of my paper as possible. Maybe the ideas will stand out more clearly that way.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,518

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Problems with late preemption.L. A. Paul - 1998 - Analysis 58 (1):48–53.
Punishment, Jesters and Judges: a Response to Nathan Hanna.Bill Wringe - 2019 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 22 (1):3-12.
Saving safety from counterexamples.Thomas Grundmann - 2018 - Synthese 197 (12):5161-5185.
Accidentally true belief and warrant.Andrew Chignell - 2003 - Synthese 137 (3):445 - 458.
Against the PCA-analysis.A. Byrne & N. Hall - 1998 - Analysis 58 (1):38-44.
Preemption and the Counterfactual Analysis of Causation.David Anthony Coady - 1999 - Dissertation, City University of New York

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
52 (#422,607)

6 months
11 (#364,844)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Noordhof
University of York

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references