Seeing the laws of nature

Metascience 3:33-38 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,180

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Critical Notice: Laws in Nature.Stathis Psillos - 2006 - Metascience 15 (3):437-69.
Thought Experiments.Rachel Cooper - 2005 - Metaphilosophy 36 (3):328-347.
John Stuart mill on induction and hypotheses.Struan Jacobs - 1991 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 29 (1):69-83.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-30

Downloads
79 (#282,279)

6 months
9 (#427,019)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Are Thought Experiments Just What You Thought?John D. Norton - 1996 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 26 (3):333 - 366.
Galileo and the indispensability of scientific thought experiment.Tamar Szabó Gendler - 1998 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (3):397-424.
Thought Experiments.Yiftach J. H. Fehige & James R. Brown - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 25 (1):135-142.
On thought experiments: Is there more to the argument?John D. Norton - 2004 - Philosophy of Science 71 (5):1139-1151.
On thought experiments as a priori science.Richard Arthur - 1999 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 13 (3):215 – 229.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references