The Irrational Game: why there’s no perfect system

In Eric Bronson (ed.), Poker and Philosophy: Pocket Rockets and Philosopher Kings. Open Court Press. pp. 105-115 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This is a chapter written for a popular audience, in which I use poker as a convenient illustration of probability, determinism and counterfactuals. More originally, I also discuss the roles of rationality versus psychological hunches, and explain why even in principle game theory cannot provide us the panacea of a perfect winning srategy. (N.B. The document I have uploaded here is slightly longer than the abbreviated version that appears in the book, and also differs in a few other minor details.)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-11-13

Downloads
446 (#64,996)

6 months
42 (#107,196)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Robert Northcott
Birkbeck, University of London

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references