The enactive approach: a briefer statement, with some remarks on “radical enactivism”

Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 20 (5):957-970 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The chief problem for the theory of mind is that of presence. In this paper I offer an explanation of this claim, and I indicate how my own “enactive” approach to mind has tried to address this problem. I also argue that other approaches, such as that undertaken by Hutto and Myin, have side-stepped the problem, instead of addressing it; their position opts for reductionism and eliminativism. This essay has two parts. The first is an exposition of the enactive approach, as I understand it, and the second is a critical evaluation of Hutto and Myin.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,937

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-07-03

Downloads
226 (#114,369)

6 months
37 (#110,797)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alva Noë
University of California, Berkeley

Citations of this work

The lived, living, and behavioral sense of perception.Thomas Netland - 2024 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 23 (2):409-433.
Mutual Incorporation, Intercorporeality, and the Problem of Mediating Systems.Robin L. Zebrowski - 2022 - Studia Universitatis Babeş-Bolyai Philosophia 67 (3):25-37.
Experience and nature in pragmatism and enactive theory.Nathaniel F. Barrett - 2025 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 24 (1):147-169.
Interview with Shaun Gallagher.Guido Caravà Baggio - 2023 - European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 15 (2).

Add more citations