To obtain the formal resolution of the Liar paradox that can be considered as the common generalization of the theorems concerned, we shall reformu-late it in a step–by–step manner in four main stages. First we shall seek an ordinary language equivalent of the paradox in a form that shows clearly its logical structure, and then we shall directly translate the expression we have

Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 9 (1) (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Gödel, Tarski, Church, and the Liar.György Serény - 2003 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 9 (1):3-25.
Some applications of infinitely long formulas.H. Jerome Keisler - 1965 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 30 (3):339-349.
Construction of truth predicates: Approximation versus revision.Juan Barba - 1998 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 4 (4):399-417.
A Liar Paradox.Richard G. Heck - 2012 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 1 (1):36-40.
Wahrheit und selbstrückbezüglichkeit.Jesus Padilla-Galvez - 1991 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 22 (1):111-132.
Rosser-Type Undecidable Sentences Based on Yablo’s Paradox.Taishi Kurahashi - 2014 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 43 (5):999-1017.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-18

Downloads
17 (#1,141,514)

6 months
4 (#1,238,277)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references