- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Respecting Participant Autonomy and the Disclosure of Clinical Trial Results
American Journal of Bioethics 9 (8):38-38 (2009)
Abstract
No abstractAuthor's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Disclosure of Adverse Clinical Trial Results—Should Legal Immunity Be Granted to Drug Companies?Anthony Vernillo - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (8):45-47.
Can Contracts Enhance Participant Autonomy in Clinical Trials?Diana Buccafurni - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (4):24-25.
Disclosing Clinical Trial Results: Publicity, Significance and Independence.S. Matthew Liao, Mark Sheehan & Steve Clarke - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (8):3-5.
The Duty to Disclose Adverse Clinical Trial Results.S. Matthew Liao, Mark Sheehan & Steve Clarke - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (8):24-32.
Informed Consent and the Disclosure of Clinical Results to Research Participants.Effy Vayena, Samia A. Hurst, Celine Moret & Alessandro Blasimme - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics 17 (7):58-60.
Clinical utility and full disclosure of genetic results to research participants.Richard R. Sharp & Morris W. Foster - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (6):42 – 44.
The Duty to Disclose (Even More) Adverse Clinical Trial Results.Nicole Hassoun - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (8):33-34.
The implausibility of the ‘Impracticality’ and ‘Professional Role’ Arguments: A commentary on Lauren Notini and Justin Oakley, ‘When (if ever) may doctors discuss religion with their patients?’.Joshua Hordern - 2022 - Bioethics 37 (1):81-87.
Justin Oakley and Dean Cocking, Virtue Ethics and Professional Roles. [REVIEW]Jennifer Welchman - 2004 - Philosophy in Review 24:217-219.
Improving Subject Recruitment By Maintaining Truly Informed Consent: A Practical Benefit of Disclosing Adverse Clinical Trial Results.Kavita R. Shah & Frances R. Batzer - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (8):36-37.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-09-14
Downloads
33 (#689,169)
6 months
1 (#1,889,689)
2010-09-14
Downloads
33 (#689,169)
6 months
1 (#1,889,689)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Disclosing Clinical Trial Results: Publicity, Significance and Independence.S. Matthew Liao, Mark Sheehan & Steve Clarke - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (8):3-5.
References found in this work
Review of Ruth R. Faden and Tom L. Beauchamp: A History and Theory of Informed Consent. [REVIEW]William G. Bartholome - 1988 - Ethics 98 (3):605-606.
The Duty to Disclose Adverse Clinical Trial Results.S. Matthew Liao, Mark Sheehan & Steve Clarke - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (8):24-32.
Research, informed consent, and the limits of disclosure.T. M. Williamson - 2001 - Bioethics 15 (4):341–363.
Accountability, Informed Consent and Clinician Report Cards.Justin Oakley & Steve Clarke - 2007 - In Steve Clarke (ed.), Informed Consent and Clinician Accountability: The Ethics of Report Cards on Surgeon Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 1-21.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-lxkd2 dc2