Infectious health care workers: should patients be told?

Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (1):27-33 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The risk of transmission of HIV or hepatitis B from infectious health care workers to patients is low. However, inadvertent exposure causes great concern amongst patients of an infected health care worker.The patients of a Scottish dentist diagnosed hepatitis B e antigen positive were informed by letter of their exposure. A sample of patients was sent a postal questionnaire. Most respondents reported feeling anxious on receiving the letter but almost all thought patients should always be informed following treatment by an infectious health care worker, although the risk was very small.We discuss clinical and ethical factors relating to informing patients following exposure to an infectious health care worker. We suggest that a balance should be struck between patients' wishes to know of risks to which they have been exposed, however small, and the professional view that when risks are negligible, patients need not be informed

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,619

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Infectious health care workers: should patients be told?A. J. Pinching - 2000 - Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (1):34-36.
Health care workers with hiv and a patient's right to know.Timothy F. Murphy - 1994 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (6):553-569.
Dentistry and the ethics of infection.David Shaw - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (3):184-187.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
53 (#401,980)

6 months
15 (#193,843)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?