The Subjective Authority of Intention

Philosophical Quarterly 69 (275):354-373 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

While much has been written about the functional profile of intentions, and about their normative or rational status, comparatively little has been said about the subjective authority of intention. What is it about intending that explains the ‘hold’ that an intention has on an agent—a hold that is palpable from her first-person perspective? I argue that several prima facie appealing explanations are not promising. Instead, I maintain that the subjective authority of intention can be explained in terms of the inner structure of intention. In adopting an intention the agent comes to see herself as criticizable depending on whether she executes the intention. This allows us to explain in first-personal terms why the agent becomes disposed to act and deliberate in ways that are characteristic of intention. As intention-formation involves profound changes to reflexive evaluative attitudes, this is the ‘Self-Evaluation’ view of the subjective authority of intention.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Intention and the authority of avowals.Andy Hamilton - 2008 - Philosophical Explorations 11 (1):23 – 37.
Modest sociality and the distinctiveness of intention.Michael E. Bratman - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 144 (1):149-165.
The Doctrine of Illicit Intentions.Alec Walen - 2005 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 34 (1):39-67.
Intentions, Intending, and Belief: Noninferential Weak Cognitivism.Philip Clark - 2020 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 101 (2):308-327.
Propositionalism about intention: shifting the burden of proof.Lucy Campbell - 2019 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 49 (2):230-252.
Ludwig on Conditional Intentions.Luca Ferrero - 2015 - Methode 4 (6):61-74.
A Dual Aspect Theory of Shared Intention.Facundo M. Alonso - 2016 - Journal of Social Ontology 2 (2):271–302.
How to Gerrymander Intention.Philip A. Reed - 2015 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 89 (3):441-460.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-12-09

Downloads
674 (#41,070)

6 months
97 (#65,445)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lilian O'Brien
University of Helsinki

Citations of this work

Against Seizing the Day.Antti Kauppinen - 2021 - Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics 11:91-111.
Varieties of Normativity: Reasons, Expectations, Wide-scope oughts, and Ought-to-be’s.Arto Laitinen - 2020 - In Rachael Mellin, Raimo Tuomela & Miguel Garcia-Godinez, Social Ontology, Normativity and Law. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter. pp. 133-158.
Telic Perfectionism and the Badness of Pain.Antti Kauppinen - forthcoming - In Mauro Rossi & Christine Tappolet, Perspectives on Ill-Being. Oxford University Press.
Zetetic supererogation.Jaakko Hirvelä - 2024 - Philosophical Issues 34 (1):167-183.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The Normativity of Rationality.Benjamin Kiesewetter - 2017 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Autonomous Agents: From Self Control to Autonomy.Alfred R. Mele - 1995 - New York, US: Oxford University Press.
Why be rational.Niko Kolodny - 2005 - Mind 114 (455):509-563.
Reasons Without Rationalism.Kieran Setiya - 2007 - Princeton University Press.
Achievement.Gwen Bradford - 2015 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.

View all 26 references / Add more references