Logos and Metaphysics: The Christological de-Structuring of Metaphysical Theism
Dissertation, Vanderbilt University (
1989)
Copy
BIBTEX
Abstract
"Ontological difference," "logos," and "the four-fold" are thematized in a study of Martin Heidegger's later work on the endings of metaphysics in terms of ontology and theology. Special attention is given to Heidegger's work with the fragments of Heraclitus. ;The study considers the implications of the deconstructive critique of Christian theology. In response to the suggestion by Robert Orr and Mark C. Taylor that the four-fold in Heidegger's later work, and deconstructive thought in general, yield an "incarnational" manner of thinking, the Christian doctrines of the incarnation are considered. In a detailed reading of the orthodox doctrine of the incarnation traced in the Chalcedonian Creed, we discover that the term "incarnation" is offered as a Latin translation/interpretation of the Greek term oikonomia. Further, we find that the doctrine of the oikonomia is assessed to be a mystery in the creed because the Christological event which it traces violates the metaphysics and epistemology of orthodox Christian onto-theology. ;It is commonly held that the doctrine of the mysterious oikonomia/ incarnation plays upon themes present in the Pauline epistles, e.g., "in Christ," "baptism," and "reconciliation." We find that Paul's Christology violates the coherence of onto-theology and serves to deconstruct causal explanation and hierarchial privileging. In other words, Christos disrupts the theological enterprise. Special consideration is given to the gender difference in the texts. Interestingly, we find that in the Pauline epistles gender hierarchies are deconstructed. Male and female are coincidental opposites in Christ with neither gender enjoying a privileged status. ;The study concludes that the implications of Heidegger's later work yields an ending to theology which is not unlike the ending traced in the orthodox Christology of the faith, i.e., the doctrine of the mysterious oikonomia. It is a closure which may be traced from the beginning of Christian thought in the difference between Christos and Theos