The origination of a human being: Rejoinder to Persson

Abstract

I rejoinder to Ingmar Persson’s reply to my paper ‘The Metaphysical Status of the Embryo: Some Arguments Revisited’. I argue that Persson, having conceded a large part of my case, has still misunderstood or not fully appreciated the force of that case when he claims the arguments I criticize still make it reasonable to think that a human being does not come into existence at fertilization. In addition, his appeal to the totipotency argument as remaining unscathed by my critique does not succeed.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,865

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

The origination of a human being: A reply to Oderberg.Ingmar Persson - 2009 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (4):371-378.
Deception and the Trinity: A Rejoinder to Tuggy.William Hasker - 2011 - Religious Studies 47 (1):117 - 120.
Moral Bioenhancement and Free Will: Continuing the Debate.Vojin Rakić - 2017 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 26 (3):384-393.
The Metaphysical Status of the Embryo: Some Arguments Revisited.David S. Oderberg - 2008 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (4):263-276.
The Storage Problem Revisited.David S. Oderberg - 2018 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly.
Killing, letting die, and the morality of abortion.Anton Tupa - 2009 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (1):1-26.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-05-28

Downloads
47 (#467,552)

6 months
4 (#1,246,333)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David S. Oderberg
University of Reading

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references