Does the Twin-Earth argument rest on a fallacy of equivocation?

Semiotica 2012 (188):347-356 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1515/sem-2012-0024

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,154

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Does twin earth rest on a mistake?Katalin Farkas - 2003 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 3 (8):155-169.
Equivocation.Bertha Alvarez Manninen - 2018-05-09 - In Robert Arp, Steven Barbone & Michael Bruce (eds.), Bad Arguments. Wiley. pp. 261–265.
Unreliable Intuitions: A New Reply to the Moral Twin-Earth Argument.Jorn Sonderholm - 2012 - Theoria 79 (1):76-88.
The intrapersonal normative twin earth argument.Jesse Hambly - 2024 - Synthese 204 (1):1-18.
Twin Earth and the Normativity of Meaning.Jon Keyzer - 2017 - Dissertation, University of Otago
Does Theological Fatalism Rest on an Equivocation?David Hunt - 1995 - American Philosophical Quarterly 32 (2):153-165.
On equivocation.Tom Stoneham - 2003 - Philosophy 78 (4):515-519.
Aristotle's Fallacy of Equivocation and Its 13th-Century Reception.Ana Maria Mora-Marquez - 2016 - In Laurent Cesalli & Alain de Libera (eds.), Formal Approaches and Natural Language in Medieval Logic. Brepols. pp. 217 - 238.
Copping out on moral twin earth.Terry Horgan & Mark Timmons - 2000 - Synthese 124 (1-2):139-152.
Moral twin earth: The intuitive argument.Heimir Geirsson - 2003 - Southwest Philosophy Review 19 (1):115-124.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-31

Downloads
38 (#584,724)

6 months
4 (#1,232,162)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Joanna Odrowąż-Sypniewska
University of Warsaw

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references