An image hurts more than 1000 words?

Communications 49 (3):421-443 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Visual content captures attention, is easy to understand, and is more likely to be remembered. However, it is not limited to conveying informative content; it can also be used to propagate hate. While existing research has predominantly focused on textual hate speech, this study aims to address a research gap by analyzing the characteristics of visual hate, including its channels, intensity, sources, and targets, through a standardized manual content analysis. The hate images were collected through the citizen science approach of data donation. Findings highlight that transgender individuals and migrants are the primary targets of visual hate. It reveals a presence of hate images not only on communication platforms but also in various intermediaries and journalistic media. Half of these images use factual or humorous methods to discriminate against individuals or groups, while an equal number adopt a highly aggressive tone. The study suggests governance measures to combat this issue effectively.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,516

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-09-05

Downloads
14 (#1,268,432)

6 months
14 (#219,708)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

What is hate speech? Part 1: The Myth of Hate.Alexander Brown - 2017 - Law and Philosophy 36 (4):419-468.
#refugeesnotwelcome: Anti-refugee discourse on Twitter.Ramona Kreis - 2017 - Discourse and Communication 11 (5):498-514.

Add more references