The normative sense: What is universal? What Varies?

In Aaron Zimmerman, Karen Jones & Mark Timmons, Routledge Handbook on Moral Epistemology. New York: Routledge (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The extent to which normative cognition varies across cultures has implications for a number of important philosophical questions. This chapter examines several striking commonalities and differences in normative cognition across cultures. We focus on cross-cultural commonality and difference in norm typologies (especially the moral-conventional distinction); the externalization of norms; which aspects of life are normativized; and some of the concepts and principles associated with the normative domain. We argue that the distinction between moral and conventional norms is probably not universal and that several concepts and principles that have been suggested as candidate universals may in fact be culturally local. We nevertheless isolate two possible universals: the phenomenon of externalizing norms and the normativization of a preferred class of subject matters.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,401

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Kinds of norms.Elizabeth O'Neill - 2017 - Philosophy Compass 12 (5):e12416.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-03-10

Downloads
53 (#427,749)

6 months
10 (#281,857)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Elizabeth O'Neill
Eindhoven University of Technology
Edouard Machery
University of Pittsburgh

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Aspects of folk morality: Objectivism and relativism.Hagop Sarkissian - 2016 - In Wesley Buckwalter & Justin Sytsma, Blackwell Companion to Experimental Philosophy. Malden, MA: Blackwell. pp. 212-224.

Add more references