On an argument about reference to future individuals

Philosophical Quarterly 45 (178):84-87 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper critically examines Roger Teichmann's defence of the claim that it is impossible to refer to future individuals. (Bibliographical details are provided in the article.)

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Future individuals.Roger Teichmann - 1991 - Philosophical Quarterly 41 (163):194-211.
Extending Direct Reference.Robert Hanna - 1997 - ProtoSociology 10:134-154.
The identity of the past.Mark Hinchliff - 2010 - In Joseph Keim Campbell, Michael O'Rourke & Harry S. Silverstein (eds.), Time and Identity. Bradford. pp. 95--110.
Futures of Value and the Destruction of Human Embryos.Rob Lovering - 2009 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 39 (3):pp. 463-88.
Empty Names and Reference.Anna Bjurman - 2003 - Dissertation, Lund University
Individuals Past, Present and Future.Barry Miller - 1981 - Philosophy 56 (216):253 - 257.
The paradox of future individuals.Gregory S. Kavka - 1982 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 11 (2):93-112.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
303 (#91,886)

6 months
60 (#93,078)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Graham Oppy
Monash University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Future individuals.Roger Teichmann - 1991 - Philosophical Quarterly 41 (163):194-211.

Add more references