Art and life in avant-garde prague, 1920–1924*: Thomas ort

Modern Intellectual History 7 (1):63-92 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay outlines the unique interpretation of the avant-garde formulated in the early 1920s by the Czech novelist, playwright, and cultural critic Karel Čapek. Whereas in Theory of the Avant-Garde Peter Bürger argued that the central problem of the avant-garde was its failure to effect a genuine reconciliation of art and life, Čapek, in contrast, worried about the prospect of success. Closely observing the practices of the Czech avant-garde group Devětsil, Čapek interpreted its attempt to fuse art and life in terms derived largely from the French vitalist philosopher Henri Bergson as an effort to free life from all constraints and bonds. Drawing on the work of Georg Simmel, he argued that the goal of living life “in itself,” without any constraints, was impossible. All life, he said, must necessarily be embodied in form and so less than completely free. Life conceived as a state of pure freedom, unbounded by any material or physical limits, amounted to the devaluation of individual life. The problem with the project of the avant-garde was that it was unethical.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,314

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-09

Downloads
19 (#1,120,317)

6 months
3 (#1,061,821)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The De-Aestheticization of Art: on Adorno's Aesthetische Theorie.Richard Wolin - 1979 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 1979 (41):105-127.

Add more references