Who Has the Right to Have Rights?

Social Philosophy Today 34:63-74 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Who has the right to be a full member of a nation-state? Inherited privileges, for reasons of birth or blood, as they are put forward by and, should force us to ask: Why is it that someone cannot become a full member of a society, even if she lives, works, and has her affective relations within the borders of that nation-state? As Ayelet Shachar underlines, the place of birth is fundamental in the assignment of political membership. The aim of this article is to examine if we should get rid of the idea of citizenship or if we can just widen the concept in order to think a theory wide enough to include those who now are misrecognized.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,561

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Balibar, citizenship, and the return of right populism.Geoff Pfeifer - 2020 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 46 (3):323-341.
Habermas's Cosmopolitan Perspective on Individual Rights and the Nation-State.Stéphane Courtois - 2006 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 2:111-118.
Habermas's Cosmopolitan Perspective on Individual Rights and the Nation-State.Stéphane Courtois - 2006 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 2:111-118.
Lecture I.William K. Frankena - 1980 - The Monist 63 (1):3-26.
Lecture I.William K. Frankena - 1980 - The Monist 63 (1):3-26.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-06-27

Downloads
40 (#540,445)

6 months
9 (#433,641)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Irene Ortiz Gala
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references