The Niebuhrian Legacy and the Idea of Responsibility

Studies in Christian Ethics 22 (4):399-422 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Reinhold and H. Richard Niebuhr developed different stances in theological ethics as well as contrasting interpretations of important circumstances and events. Despite their differences, however, when it came to the idea of responsibility, they shared a fundamental insight about the situated character of human agency. Their insight points to a substantial if also flexible Niebuhrian legacy in theological ethics, and promising and problematic features of this legacy have continued to engage the critical and constructive energies of diverse thinkers, including James M. Gustafson, Gordon D. Kaufman, Robin W. Lovin, and William Schweiker

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,793

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
38 (#571,706)

6 months
6 (#812,813)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Christian Realism: A Legacy and its Future.Robin W. Lovin - 2000 - The Annual of the Society of Christian Ethics 20:3-18.
The ego-Alter dialectic and the conscience.H. Richard Niebuhr - 1945 - Journal of Philosophy 42 (13):352-359.
Value Theory and Theology.H. Richard Niebuhr - 1937 - In Eugene Garrett Bewkes, Julius Seelye Bixler & Douglas Clyde Macintosh (eds.), The Nature of religious experience. London,: Harper & Brothers.
Religious realism in the twentieth century.H. R. Niebuhr - 1931 - In Douglas Clyde Macintosh & Arthur Kenyon Rogers (eds.), Religious realism. New York,: The Macmillan company.

Add more references