The Reification of Non-Human Animals

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 32 (1):90-104 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper takes up Axel Honneth’s suggestion that we, in the 21st century Western world, should revisit the Marxian idea of reification; unlike Honneth, however, this paper applies reification to the ways in which humans relate to non-human animals, particularly in the context of scientific experiments. Thinking about these practices through the lens of reification, the paper argues, yields a more helpful understanding of what is regarded as problematic in those practices than the standard animal rights approaches. The second part of the paper offers ways of overcoming reification that go beyond Honneth’s idea of recognition by introducing Iris Murdoch’s idea of attention. This proposed strategy makes the ethical relevance of reification more salient and makes it possible to counter reification through a practice such as attention which, unlike recognition, can be consciously established.

Other Versions

original Panizza, Silvia Caprioglio (2022) "The Reification of Non-Human Animals". Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 32(1):1-15

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-25

Downloads
29 (#778,198)

6 months
3 (#1,475,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan & Mary Midgley - 1986 - The Personalist Forum 2 (1):67-71.
Objectification.Martha C. Nussbaum - 1995 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 24 (4):249-291.
Eating Meat and Eating People.Cora Diamond - 1978 - Philosophy 53 (206):465 - 479.

View all 12 references / Add more references