On some philosophical accounts of perception

Journal of Philosophical Research 28 (9999):71-82 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Philosophical accounts of perception in the tradition of Kant and Reid have generally supposed that an event of making a judgment is a key element in every perceptual experience. An alternative very austere view regards perception as an event containing nothing judgmental, nor anything conceptual. This account of perception as nonconceptual is discussed first historically as found in the philosophies of Locke and (briefly) Berkeley, and then examined in the contemporary work of Chisholm and Alston

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,010

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Was Kant a nonconceptualist?Hannah Ginsborg - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 137 (1):65 - 77.
Perception.Barry Maund - 2003 - Chesham, Bucks: Routledge.
Content and Causation in Perception.Michael Pendlebury - 1994 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54 (4):767-785.
Kant and Husserl on bringing perception to judgment.Corijn Van Mazijk - 2016 - Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy 8 (2):419-441.
Perception, Reasons, and Causes.Jon Joseph Kanitz - 1983 - Dissertation, University of Toronto (Canada)

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
86 (#243,853)

6 months
15 (#206,160)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Representationism and Presentationism.Mats Bergman - 2007 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (1):53-89.
Berkeley's Assessment of Locke's Epistemology.George S. Pappas - 2007 - In Stephen Hartley Daniel (ed.), Reexamining Berkeley's Philosophy. University of Toronto Press.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references