A qualitative evaluation of information leaflets for gastroscopy procedure

, , , &
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 9 (4):423-431 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1046/j.1365-2753.2003.00397.x

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,809

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

How do doctors use information in real‐time? A qualitative study of internal medicine resident precepting.Jon C. Tilburt, Susan D. Goold, Nazema Siddiqui & Rajesh S. Mangrulkar - 2007 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 13 (5):772-780.
An independent evaluation of the modernization of NHS endoscopy services in England: data poverty and no improvement.Kymberley Thorne, Hayley A. Hutchings & Glyn Elwyn - 2010 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (4):693-699.
Reframing the evaluation of qualitative health research: reflections on a review of appraisal guidelines in the health sciences.Joan M. Eakin & Eric Mykhalovskiy - 2003 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 9 (2):187-194.
Qualitative research in health care: II. A structured review and evaluation of studies.Mary Boulton, Ray Fitzpatrick & Clare Swinburn - 1996 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2 (3):171-179.
The role of qualitative research in broadening the 'evidence base' for clinical practice.Rosaline S. Barbour Ma - 2000 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 6 (2):155-163.
How to assess rigour . . . or not in qualitative papers.Joanna E. M. Sale - 2008 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 14 (5):912-913.
Are patient information leaflets contributing to informed consent for cataract surgery?H. Brown - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (2):218-220.
Towards an evaluation framework for information quality management (IQM) practices for health information systems – evaluation criteria for effective IQM practices.Siti Asma Mohammed & Maryati Mohd Yusof - 2013 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 19 (2):379-387.
Evaluation of clinical information systems. What can be evaluated and what cannot.Burkle Thomas, Ammenwerth Elske, Prokosch Hans-Ulrich & Dudeck Joachim - 2001 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 7 (4).

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
32 (#703,717)

6 months
10 (#399,629)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references