Confirmation measures and collaborative belief updating

Synthese 191 (16):3955-3975 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There are some candidates that have been thought to measure the degree to which evidence incrementally confirms a hypothesis. This paper provides an argument for one candidate—the log-likelihood ratio measure. For this purpose, I will suggest a plausible requirement that I call the Requirement of Collaboration. And then, it will be shown that, of various candidates, only the log-likelihood ratio measure \(l\) satisfies this requirement. Using this result, Jeffrey conditionalization will be reformulated so as to disclose explicitly what determines new credences after experience

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,937

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-06-28

Downloads
86 (#243,853)

6 months
10 (#407,001)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ilho Park
Jeonbuk National University

Citations of this work

Inductive Logic.Vincenzo Crupi - 2015 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 44 (6):641-650.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Philosophical explanations.Robert Nozick - 1981 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Logical foundations of probability.Rudolf Carnap - 1950 - Chicago]: Chicago University of Chicago Press.
Philosophical Explanations.Robert Nozick - 1981 - Mind 93 (371):450-455.
Probability and the Art of Judgment.Richard C. Jeffrey - 1992 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

View all 36 references / Add more references