Standards, norms, and guidelines for permissible withdrawal of life support from seriously compromised newborns

American Journal of Bioethics 11 (2):33 - 34 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

(2011). Standards, Norms, and Guidelines for Permissible Withdrawal of Life Support From Seriously Compromised Newborns. The American Journal of Bioethics: Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 33-34

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/15265161.2010.540064

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,401

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Parental refusal of medical treatment for a newborn.John J. Paris, Michael D. Schreiber & Michael P. Moreland - 2007 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (5):427-441.
From Birth to Death? A Personalist Approach to End-of-Life Care of Severely Ill Newborns.Chris Gastmans, Gunnar Naulaers, Chris Vanhole & Yvonne Denier - 2013 - Christian Bioethics 19 (1):7-24.
Battle of the Bridge: Ethical Considerations Related to Withdrawal of ECMO Support for Pediatric Patients over Family Objections.Jenny Kingsley, Emily R. Berkman & Sabrina F. Derrington - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (6):32-35.
Life and death choices in neonatal care: applying shared decision-making focused on parental values.Alexander A. Kon - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (2):35 - 36.
Taking Our Obligations to Research Participants Seriously: Disclosing Individual Results of Genetic Research.Teri A. Manolio - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (6):32-34.
Newborns in crisis: An outline of neonatal ethical dilemmas in humanitarian medicine.Jesse Schnall, Dean Hayden & Dominic Wilkinson - 2019 - Developing World Bioethics 19 (4):196-205.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Withdrawal of Nonfutile Life Support After Attempted Suicide”.Samuel M. Brown, C. Gregory Elliott & Robert Paine - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics: 13 (3):W3 - W5.
Unilateral ECMO Withdrawal and the Argument From Distributive Justice.Daniel Edward Callies - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (6):72-74.
Attitudes of Japanese bioethical educators towards life-sustaining treatment in the Wendland case. A descriptive study.Sachi Chiba, Koichiro Itai, Yachiyo Tsuchiya, Motoki Onishi & Shinji Kosugi - 2008 - Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 18 (2):34-39.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-02-19

Downloads
87 (#248,975)

6 months
10 (#281,857)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Shedding Light on the Gray Zone.Dominic James Wilkinson - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (2):W3 - W5.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Mongolism, Parental Desires, and the Right to Life.James M. Gustafson - 1973 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 16 (4):529-557.
Imperiled Newborns.Kathleen Nolan - 1987 - Hastings Center Report 17 (6):5-32.
Imperiled Newborns.Arthur Caplan & Cynthia B. Cohen - 1987 - Hastings Center Report 17 (6):5.
8 Child Abuse and Neglect Prevention and Treatment.Subpart A.—General Provisions - forthcoming - Bioethics: Basic Writings on the Key Ethical Questions That Surround the Major, Modern Biological Possibilities and Problems.

Add more references