" To be an object" means" to have properties." Thus, any object has at least one property. A good formalization of this simple conclusion is a thesis of second-order logic:(1) Vx3P (Px) This formalization is based on two assumptions:(a) object variables [Book Review]

In J. Jadacki & J. Pasniczek (eds.), The Lvov-Warsaw School: The New Generation. Reidel. pp. 6--129 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,676

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Simple Formalization And Proof For The Mutilated Chess Board.L. Paulson - 2001 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 9 (3):475-485.
Mally's heresy and the logic of meinong's object theory.Dale Jacquette - 1989 - History and Philosophy of Logic 10 (1):1-14.
Counterfactual Similarity, Nomic Indiscernibility, and the Paradox of Quidditism.Andrew D. Bassford & C. Daniel Dolson - 2024 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 67 (1):230-261.
Ontology of Logic and Mathematics in Lvov-Warsaw School.Roman Murawski - 2018 - In Urszula Wybraniec-Skardowska & Ángel Garrido (eds.), The Lvov-Warsaw School. Past and Present. Cham, Switzerland: Springer- Birkhauser,. pp. 645-661.
Logic and Its History in the Lvov-Warsaw School.Kordula Świętorzecka & Marcin Łyczak - 2024 - History and Philosophy of Logic 45 (2):93-97.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-01

Downloads
12 (#1,364,282)

6 months
2 (#1,686,333)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references