The Individual Mandate: Implications for Public Health Law

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (3):401-413 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

No provision of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act has proven to be more contentious than the so-called “individual mandate.” Starting in 2014, the mandate will impose a penalty on non-exempt individuals who lack health insurance. According to Congress, the mandate is essential to ensuring near universal coverage. Without it, PPACA’s insurance reforms will lead healthy individuals to delay purchasing health insurance until they require medical care, resulting in risk pools with a disproportionate share of high-risk people. The price of insurance will then climb, causing more and more not-so-sick people to forego health insurance. The resulting “death spiral” will make insurance unaffordable to many more Americans.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,937

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Constitutionality of Mandates to Purchase Health Insurance.Mark A. Hall - 2009 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 37 (s2):38-50.
The Moral Duty to Buy Health Insurance.Tina Rulli, Ezekiel Emanuel & David Wendler - 2012 - Journal of the American Medical Association 308 (2):137-138.
What Is Left of Charity Care after Health Reform?Jessica Wilen Berg - 2010 - Hastings Center Report 40 (4):12-13.
How Ought Health Care Be Allocated? Two Proposals.Elicia Grilley Green, Robert Truog & J. Wesley Boyd - 2019 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 62 (4):765-777.
Protect the Sick: Health Insurance Reform in One Easy Lesson.Deborah Stone - 2008 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (4):652-659.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-08-23

Downloads
78 (#268,621)

6 months
9 (#485,111)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?