The Liberal Paradox: Some Interpretations When Rights Are Represented As Game Forms

Analyse & Kritik 18 (1):38-53 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper seeks to interpret the liberal paradox in a framework where individual rights are represented as game forms. Several close counterparts, in this framework, of Sen’s theorem are considered, and their intuitive significance is discussed.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1515/auk-1996-0103

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,169

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Rights: Formulation and Consequences.Amartya Sen - 1996 - Analyse & Kritik 18 (1):153-170.
Admissibility and Feasibility in Game Forms.Marc Fleurbaey & Wulf Gaertner - 1996 - Analyse & Kritik 18 (1):54-66.
Welfare, Rights, and Social Choice Procedure: A Perspective.Kotaro Suzumura - 1996 - Analyse & Kritik 18 (1):20-37.
Individual Rights and Legal Validity.Martin van Hees - 1996 - Analyse & Kritik 18 (1):81-95.
Invoking a Cartesian product structure on social states: New resolutions of Sen’s and Gibbard’s impossibility theorems.Herrade Igersheim - 2013 - Theory and Decision 74 (4):463-477.
Constitutional and Liberal Rights.Dennis C. Mueller - 1996 - Analyse & Kritik 18 (1):96-117.
A liberal paradox for judgment aggregation.Franz Dietrich & Christian List - 2008 - Social Choice and Welfare 31 (1):59-78.
Das Paradox des Liberalismus= The liberal paradox.Hartmut Kliemt - 1996 - Analyse & Kritik 18 (1).
What is the philosophical significance of Sen's 'Liberal Paradox'?Greg Fried - 2011 - Philosophical Papers 40 (1):129-147.
The Liberal Paradox.Some Interpretations When Rights - 1996 - Analyse & Kritik 18:38-53.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-30

Downloads
21 (#1,105,144)

6 months
7 (#614,157)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Game Theory in Philosophy.Boudewijn de Bruin - 2005 - Topoi 24 (2):197-208.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Rights to Liberty in Purely Private Matters.Jonathan Riley - 1989 - Economics and Philosophy 5 (2):121.

Add more references