Ethics of Social Consequences and Evolutionary Ontology in Contemporary Environmental Ethics

Pro-Fil 20 (1):45-64 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The article deals with an analysis, comparison and evaluation of Evolutionary Ontology by Josef Šmajs and Ethics of Social Consequences by Vasil Gluchman. It focuses on the similarities between the two theories as well as on some of their differences, especially in relation to environmental ethics. Both theories were created simultaneously in two bordering countries and are still to a great extent inspirational, open to criticism and reflected in the philosophical and ethical community.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Modernism and nihilism of the Constitution for the Earth.Slavomír Lesňák - 2019 - Ethics and Bioethics (in Central Europe) 9 (1-2):57-63.
Critical review of theory and practice in ethics of social consequences.Lukáš Švaňa - 2018 - Ethics and Bioethics (in Central Europe) 8 (1-2):139-147.
Ethics of Social Consequences as a Contemporary Consequentialist Theory.Ján Kalajtzidis - 2013 - Ethics and Bioethics (in Central Europe) 3 (3-4):159-171.
Vasil Gluchman, Slovak Lutheran Social Ethics. [REVIEW]John Dick - 1998 - Ethical Perspectives 5 (2):169-169.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-08-20

Downloads
3 (#1,852,803)

6 months
3 (#1,477,354)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references