Two Problems for Non-Inferentialist Views of the Meta-Problem

Journal of Consciousness Studies 27 (5-6):156-165 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The meta-problem of consciousness is to explain why we think that there is a hard problem of consciousness. On Chalmers' view of the meta-problem, our judgments about the hard problem of consciousness arise non-inferentially as a result of introspection. I raise two problems for such a non-inferentialist view of the metaproblem. It does not seem to match the psychological facts about how we come to the realization of the hard problem, and it is unclear how the view can bridge the gap between the content of introspection and the content involved in formulations of the hard problem. The inferentialist view of the meta-problem, on which the hard problem results from inference, explains both the psychology and content introduction. We should therefore prefer an inferentialist view of the meta-problem.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,401

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-05-21

Downloads
59 (#377,787)

6 months
5 (#702,808)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Graham Peebles
University of Tokyo

Citations of this work

Is the Hard Problem of Consciousness Universal?David Chalmers - 2020 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 27 (5-6):227-257.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references