Beware the Biomarkers for Criminal Behavior

Hastings Center Report 43 (4):inside back cover-inside back co (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

As functional magnetic resonance imaging becomes more precise and the data more extensive, neuroscientists like Kent Kiehl are raising the possibility that such research might someday, together with existing clinical assessment tools, increase our ability to predict the likelihood that a given convict will commit another crime after getting out of prison. Such an advance would provoke challenging questions about our notions of liberty and personal autonomy, with potentially chilling ramifications.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Functional magnetic resonance imaging, Covert awareness, and brain iniury.Adrian M. Owen - 2013 - In Judy Illes & Barbara J. Sahakian (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Neuroethics. Oxford University Press. pp. 135.
Living with the Ancient Puzzle.Erik Parens - 2014 - Hastings Center Report 44 (s2):50-52.
The Ethics of Altruism in Clinical Research.Lynn A. Jansen - 2009 - Hastings Center Report 39 (4):26-36.
Brain Imaging and Courtroom Deception.Rebecca Dresser - 2010 - Hastings Center Report 40 (6):7-8.
Personal Liberty and Behavior Control Technology.Perry London - 1972 - Hastings Center Report 2 (1):4-7.
H5N1 and the Politics of Truth.Gaymon Bennett - 2013 - Hastings Center Report 43 (2):35-37.
Genetic Prediction.Eric Turkheimer - 2015 - Hastings Center Report 45 (S1):32-38.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
40 (#553,424)

6 months
6 (#825,551)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references