Automated natural deduction in thinker

Studia Logica 60 (1):3-43 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Although resolution-based inference is perhaps the industry standard in automated theorem proving, there have always been systems that employed a different format. For example, the Logic Theorist of 1957 produced proofs by using an axiomatic system, and the proofs it generated would be considered legitimate axiomatic proofs; Wang’s systems of the late 1950’s employed a Gentzen-sequent proof strategy; Beth’s systems written about the same time employed his semantic tableaux method; and Prawitz’s systems of again about the same time are often said to employ a natural deduction format. [See Newell, et al (1957), Beth (1958), Wang (1960), and Prawitz et al (1960)]. Like sequent proof systems and tableaux proof systems, natural deduction systems retain..

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,619

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
117 (#182,427)

6 months
5 (#1,011,641)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

First-order logic.Raymond Merrill Smullyan - 1968 - New York [etc.]: Springer Verlag.
Logic: Techniques of Formal Reasoning.Donald Kalish, Richard Montague & Gary Mar - 1964 - New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press USA. Edited by Richard Montague.
Logic.Donald Kalish - 1964 - New York,: Harcourt, Brace & World. Edited by Richard Montague.
How to reason defeasibly.John L. Pollock - 1992 - Artificial Intelligence 57 (1):1-42.
Non-resolution theorem proving.W. W. Bledsoe - 1977 - Artificial Intelligence 9 (1):1-35.

View all 16 references / Add more references