In Favor of Meritocracy, not Against Democracy

Philosophy and Public Issues - Filosofia E Questioni Pubbliche 7 (1) (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Regarding the selection of the legislative representatives, the elective system is the system that most democratic organizations have adopted. It has become so present nowadays that we take for granted the identification between elective system and representative democracy. But is this identification a correct one? I argue that it is not, since the meaning of 'representative democracy' has no reference to specific mode of selection of the representatives. And, since democracy and other methods of selection are compatible, it should adopted the best one. The criteria of competence for the exercise of the political power ought to be the adopted method of selection, for it is the best one. I too argue that, in the context of division of labor into public and private labor, this is precisely what public representation aims: to leave to the experts the exercise of public labor.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,561

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-01-06

Downloads
43 (#498,107)

6 months
3 (#1,498,119)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ricardo Tavares Da Silva
Universidade de Lisboa

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references