How Demonstratives Denote

Southern Journal of Philosophy 22 (1):91-104 (1984)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Focusing on the simple demonstrative ‘that’ and demonstrative expressions of the form ‘that F,’ this paper reviews four accounts of what determines the denotations of demonstratives—the description theory, according to which the work is done by a proper definite description associated with the demonstrative; the causal theory, according to which it is done by a non-deviant causal chain connecting the object and the demonstrative; the demonstration theory, according to which it is done by a demonstration accompanying the demonstrative; and the mental reference theory, according to which it is done by the mental act of reference that the demonstrative expresses—and it offers evidence of the superiority of the mental reference theory.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On the Semantics of Simple and Complex Demonstratives in English.Michael Pendlebury - 2001 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 39 (4):487-505.
Demonstrative thought.Joseph Levine - 2010 - Mind and Language 25 (2):169-195.
Nonconceptual demonstrative reference.Athanassius Raftopoulos & Vincent Muller - 2006 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72 (2):251-285.
Studies Toward a Theory of Indexical Reference.William Walter Taschek - 1983 - Dissertation, The Johns Hopkins University
Complex demonstratives and their singular contents.David Braun - 2008 - Linguistics and Philosophy 31 (1):57-99.
The Role of Intentions in Perceptual Demonstrative Utterances.Robert M. Seltzer - 2000 - Dissertation, State University of New York at Albany
The Semantic Significance of Referential Intentions.Margaret Reimer - 1992 - Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-15

Downloads
57 (#382,908)

6 months
7 (#764,599)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Pendlebury
North Carolina State University

Citations of this work

Stalnaker on Inquiry.Michael Pendlebury - 1987 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 16 (3):229-272.
Demonstratives, context-sensitivity, and coherence.Michael Devitt - 2024 - Linguistics and Philosophy 47 (2):317-339.
On the Semantics of Simple and Complex Demonstratives in English.Michael Pendlebury - 2001 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 39 (4):487-505.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references