Einstein, Gödel, Bohr

Foundations of Physics 15 (2):201-205 (1985)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Linear combinations of “elements of reality,” as defined by Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen, may not be themselves “elements of reality.” There are questions which can be formulated (and unambiguously answered) in the ordinary language of experimental physics, but cannot be represented in the mathematical framework of quantum theory in a nontrivial way

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,010

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-30

Downloads
108 (#197,384)

6 months
9 (#488,506)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

When realism made a difference: The constitution of matter and its conceptual enigmas in late 19th century physics.Torsten Wilholt - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 39 (1):1-16.
Inconsistency of the Copenhagen interpretation.C. I. J. M. Stuart - 1991 - Foundations of Physics 21 (5):591-622.
Quantum mechanics is compatible with realism.M. E. Burgos - 1987 - Foundations of Physics 17 (8):809-812.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references