Future Contingents and the Battle Tomorrow

Review of Metaphysics 64 (3):581-602 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Using Aristotle's well-known sea battle as our example, we offer a precise, intelligible analysis of future contingent assertions in the presence of indeterminism. After explaining our view of the problem, we present a picture of indeterminism in the context of a tree ofbranching histories. There follows a brief description ofthe semantic bases for our double-time-reference theory of future contingents. We then set out our account. Before concluding, we discuss some ramifications of, and alternatives to, a double-time-reference approach to the problem of future contingents. There are some technical ideas at the foundation of our analysis, ideas of which most philosophers are largely ignorant; on our view, in the absence of mastery ofthese ideas it is quite impossible to speak responsibly about either indeterminism or free will

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-13

Downloads
242 (#106,422)

6 months
17 (#161,731)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nuel Belnap
University of Pittsburgh

References found in this work

Demonstratives.David Kaplan - 1989 - In Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes From Kaplan. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 481--563.
Branching space-time.Nuel Belnap - 1992 - Synthese 92 (3):385 - 434.
Thoughts on demonstratives.David Kaplan - 1990 - In Palle Yourgrau (ed.), Demonstratives. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 34-49.

Add more references