Motivating the Search for Alternatives to Personal OmniGod Theism: The Case from Classical Theism

European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 10 (4):97-118 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Analytic philosophers of religion typically take God to be ‘the personal omniGod’ – a person who is omnipotent, omniscient and omnibenevolent, and who creates and sustains all else that exists. Analytic philosophers also tend to assume that the personal omniGod is the God of ‘classical’ theism. Arguably, this is a mistake. To be consistent, a classical theist or her supporter must deny that God is literally a person. They need not, however, deny the aptness of using personal language, or of thinking of God as a person or personal at the level of religious psychology.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-12-19

Downloads
797 (#30,165)

6 months
160 (#25,645)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

An Essay Concerning Human Understanding.John Locke - 1690 - Cleveland,: Oxford University Press UK. Edited by P. H. Nidditch.
An Essay Concerning Human Understanding.John Locke - 1979 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 169 (2):221-222.
Horrendous evils and the goodness of God.Marilyn McCord Adams - 1989 - Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press. Edited by Eleonore Stump & Michael J. Murray.
Church Dogmatics.Karl Barth - 1956 - Edinburgh: T and T Clark. Edited by Thomas F. Torrance & Geoffrey Bromiley.
Time and Eternity.Brian Leftow - 2018 - Cornell University Press.

View all 34 references / Add more references