What Are Data Good for Anyway?

Social Theory and Practice 46 (2):339-364 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article develops a typology of usages for empirical data in normative theorizing in ‎contemporary political theory. A typology of usages is indicated, providing definitions, ‘names’ and an analysis for each ‎usage, and points to the typical stage within political theory research for each usage. The typology is built in a casuistic methodology. It includes the following categories: Spotlighting, Definition, ‎‎ Conversion, Institutional clarity, Theoretical clarity, and Theory improvement. The typology creates a novel toolbox that can be adopted by political theorists; and it clarifies the methods and achievements of data-sensitive political theory.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,297

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Financial Risks and Social Justice – Three Perspectives.Teppo Eskelinen - 2016 - Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory 63 (148):1-16.
Economics.Geoffrey Brennan - 1996 - In Robert E. Goodin, Philip Pettit & Thomas Winfried Menko Pogge (eds.), A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 118–152.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-04-04

Downloads
24 (#916,108)

6 months
10 (#422,339)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Normative behaviourism: groups it cannot reach?Simon Stevens - forthcoming - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references