Enhancing induction in a contraction free logic with unrestricted abstraction: from $$\mathbf {Z}$$ Z to $$\mathbf {Z}_2$$ Z 2

Archive for Mathematical Logic:1-45 (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

\ is a new type of non-finitist inference, i.e., an inference that involves treating some infinite collection as completed, designed for contraction free logic with unrestricted abstraction. It has been introduced in Petersen and shown to be consistent within a system \ \ of contraction free logic with unrestricted abstraction. In Petersen :665–694, 2003) it was established that adding \ to \ \ is sufficient to prove the totality of primitive recursive functions but it was also indicated that this would not extend to 2-recursive functions such as the Ackermann–Péter function, for instance. The purpose of the present paper is to expand the underlying idea in the construction of \ to gain a stronger notion, conveniently labeled \, which is sufficient to prove a form of nested double induction and thereby the totality of 2-recursive functions.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-03-15

Downloads
12 (#1,372,094)

6 months
5 (#1,047,105)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references