The Consequentialist Perspective

In Marcia W. Baron, Philip Pettit & Michael Slote (eds.), Three Methods of Ethics: A Debate. Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,774

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Consequentialist Perspective.William Shaw - 2006 - In James Lawrence Dreier (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Moral Theory. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 6--5.
Marcia Baron, Philip Pettit, and Michael Slote, Three Methods of Ethics.S. Tudor - 1999 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 77 (1):110.
Uneasy Virtue.Julia Driver - 2001 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Consequentialism and the Synthetic Biology Problem.Patrick Heavey - 2017 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 26 (2):206-229.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-08-19

Downloads
43 (#497,743)

6 months
1 (#1,945,873)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Philip Pettit
Australian National University

Citations of this work

Epistemic Teleology and the Separateness of Propositions.Selim Berker - 2013 - Philosophical Review 122 (3):337-393.
Consequentialism.Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 2019 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Consequentializing moral theories.Douglas W. Portmore - 2007 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88 (1):39–73.
Value theory.Mark Schroeder - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Reliabilism without Epistemic Consequentialism.Kurt L. Sylvan - 2018 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (3):525-555.

View all 71 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references