Universal Grammar as a Theory of Notation

Axiomathes 16 (4):460-485 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What is common to all languages is notation, so Universal Grammar can be understood as a system of notational types. Given that infants acquire language, it can be assumed to arise from some a priori mental structure. Viewing language as having the two layers of calculus and protocol, we can set aside the communicative habits of speakers. Accordingly, an analysis of notation results in the three types of Identifier, Modifier and Connective. Modifiers are further interpreted as Quantifiers and Qualifiers. The resulting four notational types constitute the categories of Universal Grammar. Its ontology is argued to consist in the underlying cognitive schema of Essence, Quantity, Quality and Relation. The four categories of Universal Grammar are structured as polysemous fields and are each constituted as a radial network centred on some root concept which, however, need not be lexicalized. The branches spread out along troponymic vectors and together map out all possible lexemes. The notational typology of Universal Grammar is applied in a linguistic analysis of the ‘parts of speech’ using the English language. The analysis constitutes a ‘proof of concept’ in (1) showing how the schema of Universal Grammar is capable of classifying the so-called ‘parts of speech’, (2) presenting a coherent analysis of the verb, and (3) showing how the underlying cognitive schema allows for a sub-classification of the auxiliaries.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,174

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Oxford Handbook of Universal Grammar.Ian G. Roberts (ed.) - 2016 - Oxford University Press UK.
Subject and Predicate in Logic and Grammar. [REVIEW]John Peterson - 2005 - Review of Metaphysics 58 (3):685-687.
The Epistemological Classification of Universals Types.Herman Parret - 1983 - der 16. Weltkongress Für Philosophie 2:1002-1009.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-20

Downloads
11 (#1,422,077)

6 months
4 (#1,255,690)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Architecture of Complexity.Herbert A. Simon - 1962 - Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 106.
Cratylus. Plato - 1997 - In J. M. Cooper (ed.), Plato: Complete Works. Hackett. pp. 101--156.
Opening the debate.J. Piaget & N. Chomsky - 1980 - In Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini (ed.), Language and Learning: The Debate Between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky. Harvard University Press. pp. 23--34.

View all 10 references / Add more references