Searle, strong AI, and two ways of sorting cucumbers

Journal of Philosophical Research 17:347-50 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper defends Searle against the misconstrual of a key claim of “Minds, Brains, and Programs” and goes on to explain why an attempt to turn the tables by using the Chinese Room to argue for intentionality in computers fails

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Chinese room argument.Larry Hauser - 2001 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Artificial minds: Cam on Searle.David J. Cole - 1991 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 69 (3):329-33.
Searle's misunderstandings of functionalism and strong AI.Georges Rey - 2002 - In John Mark Bishop & John Preston (eds.), Views Into the Chinese Room: New Essays on Searle and Artificial Intelligence. London: Oxford University Press. pp. 201--225.
Nixin' goes to china.Larry Hauser - 2002 - In John Mark Bishop & John Preston (eds.), Views Into the Chinese Room: New Essays on Searle and Artificial Intelligence. London: Oxford University Press. pp. 123--143.
Searle's chinese room argument.Larry Hauser - unknown - Field Guide to the Philosophy of Mind.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
99 (#208,729)

6 months
13 (#231,061)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Karl Pfeifer
University of Saskatchewan

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references