Is Impossible Worlds Semantics Compositional? An objection to Berto and Jago’s Account

Abstract

The aim of the present article is to investigate the tenability of the principle of compositionality within an impossible worlds framework. To understand how this question is raised, the first section will be devoted to explaining what the principle of compositionality is and how it is compatile with a possible worlds semantics. In the following section, some arguments from hyperintentionality will be provided against such semantics. The third section will introduce the notion of impossible worlds as adequate tools to accommodate such arguments, with particular attention to Berto and Jago’s account (2019). In the fourth section a solution to the compositionality objection towards an impossible worlds semantics will be presented. Finally, the paper will conclude with a possile objection towards such solution

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Impossible worlds.Martin Vacek - 2023 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Are Impossible Worlds Trivial?Mark Jago - 2013 - In Vit Puncochar & Petr Svarny (eds.), The Logica Yearbook 2012. College Publications.
On modal Meinongianism.Thibaut Giraud - 2016 - Synthese 193 (10).
Mission Impossible.Graham Priest - 2024 - In Yale Weiss & Romina Birman (eds.), Saul Kripke on Modal Logic. Cham: Springer. pp. 347-364.
Concrete Impossible Worlds.Martin Vacek - 2013 - Filozofia 68 (6):523-530.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-01-09

Downloads
172 (#136,587)

6 months
65 (#88,032)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references