Is science all you need? [Book Review]

The Philosophers' Magazine 57 (2nd Quarter):111-112 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Why Rosenberg's bland of nihilistic atheism is problematic.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

1354814X

DOI

10.5840/tpm20125760

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Pareyson interprete di Dostoevskij.Sergio Givone - 2017 - Annuario Filosofico 33:139-152.
Free will explained: how science and philosophy converge to create a beautiful illusion.Dan Barker - 2018 - New York: Sterling. Edited by Michael Shermer.
All due respect - “Reasonable Atheism” by Aikin and Talisse reviewed. [REVIEW]Michael Antony - 2011 - The Philosophers' Magazine (55):108-109.
Why paraphrase nihilism fails.Shane Maxwell Wilkins - 2016 - Synthese 193 (8):2619--2632.
The Compatibility between the Religious and the Nihilistic Currents in Dostoevsky’s World.Haozhan Sun - 2021 - Labyrinth: An International Journal for Philosophy, Value Theory and Sociocultural Hermeneutics 23 (1):39-58.
Atheism, Amorality, and Animals.Joel Marks - 2011 - The New York Times.
Massimo Pigliucci: Nonsense on Stilts: How to Tell Science from Bunk.Ron Good - 2012 - Science & Education 21 (3):435-440.
Philosophy of Science Panel Discussion.Leonard Finkelman, Jonathan Kaplan, Massimo Pigliucci & Evan Tracy - unknown

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-06-07

Downloads
4,682 (#1,727)

6 months
143 (#36,422)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Massimo Pigliucci
CUNY Graduate Center

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references