Temperance and the Second-Person Perspective

European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 12 (3):101-115 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The virtue of temperance with respect to food and drink is often assumed to be relatively straightforward, a matter of steering a mean between excess and deficiency. Given also that humans share the need to eat and drink with non-human animals, this topic might therefore seem promising to explore for possible connections between evolutionary research on morality and theological ethics. In this paper, however, I argue that many aspects of temperance go far beyond the Aristotelian account and can be understood principally as reflecting the fact that human beings are embodied relational persons. This second-person account can indeed be connected to theological ethics, but it is also one that draws principally from the discontinuities of human and non-human behaviour.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-09-25

Downloads
35 (#720,799)

6 months
6 (#724,158)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andrew Pinsent
Oxford University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references