Non-Dualism and Self-Reference in Constructivism

Constructivist Foundations 13 (2):209-211 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Open peer commentary on the article “Towards a Dialogue Among Constructivist Research Programs” by Gastón Becerra & José Antonio Castorina. Upshot: The target article claims that constructivism should be regarded as a manifold movement, but not as a unique philosophical doctrine. This commentary evaluates the legitimacy of this claim.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,154

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Forms of Constructivism and Forms for Constructivism.Hugo Cadenas - 2018 - Constructivist Foundations 13 (2):202-204.
Some Remarks on the Social Construction of Constructivism.Raf Vanderstaeten - 2018 - Constructivist Foundations 13 (2):201-202.
Boundaries between and Variety within Approaches.Armin Scholl - 2018 - Constructivist Foundations 13 (2):206-208.
From Constructivist Monologues to Dialogues and Polylogues.Theo Hug - 2018 - Constructivist Foundations 13 (2):204-206.
Constructivisms and Ivo Kohler’s Goggles.Hugh Gash - 2018 - Constructivist Foundations 13 (2):199-200.
Towards a Metaphysics for Constructivist Thought.S. A. Koutroufinis - 2015 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (1):163-165.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-08-12

Downloads
5 (#1,744,915)

6 months
2 (#1,683,984)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references