- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The Evolutionary Argument against Naturalism: An Initial Statement of the Argument
In Michael Ruse (ed.), Philosophy After Darwin: Classic and Contemporary Readings. Princeton University Press. pp. 301 (2009)
Abstract
This chapter contains sections titled: * NotesAuthor's Profile
evolutionary argument against naturalism Naturalism - view that there is no such person as God or anything like God Naturalism performing important function of religion - providing adherents with a worldview proportion of true beliefs among adaptive beliefs semantic epiphenomenalism - received view as to relation between belief and behavior Naturalistic evolution religion/science conflict - between naturalism and science
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Can Robots think : reply to Tooley's second statement.Alvin Plantinga - 2008 - In Alvin Plantinga & Michael Tooley (eds.), Knowledge of God. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 218–232.
Scratching the Surface: A Review of Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion & Naturalism. [REVIEW]Scott D. G. Ventureyra - 2014 - Convivium 3 (16):38-40.
What’s wrong with the evolutionary argument against naturalism?Geoff Childers - 2011 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69 (3):193-204.
The evolutionary argument against naturalism: context, exposition, and repercussions.Jim Slagle - 2021 - New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
Reply to Plantinga's Opening Statement.Alvin Plantinga & Michael Tooley - 2008 - In Alvin Plantinga & Michael Tooley (eds.), Knowledge of God. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 184–217.
A House Divided Against Itself Cannot Stand: Plantinga on the Self-Defeat of Evolutionary Naturalism.Timothy O'Connor - 2002 - In James K. Beilby (ed.), Naturalism defeated?: essays on Plantinga's evolutionary argument against naturalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-30
Downloads
269 (#99,598)
6 months
15 (#200,807)
2014-01-30
Downloads
269 (#99,598)
6 months
15 (#200,807)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Darwin's Doubts and the Problems of Animal Pain.Eric Russert Kraemer - 2002 - Between the Species 13 (2):2.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-wmc4m dc2