Could Globalisation be Good for World Health?

Global Justice: Theory Practice Rhetoric 1:1-10 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Every day thousands of people die from poverty-related causes. Many of these deaths could be avoided if appropriate medical treatments were available to the world’s poor. Due to the current tructure of the international patent regime, they are not. Since the risks and costs associated with pharmaceutical innovation are extremely high, to incentivise research, inventor firms are granted a temporary monopoly over newly invented drugs. While allowing firms to make up for the costs of research, this has the morally perverse effect of raising the prices of pharmaceuticals to a level where they become unaffordable to the world’s poor. To correct this grievous flaw, the paper proposes a concrete and realistic alternative scheme which, by rewarding medical innovators in proportion to the impact of their drugs on the global disease burden, would incentivise the production and selling of crucial drugs for the world’s poor at prices accessible to them.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,888

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-01-18

Downloads
11 (#1,417,674)

6 months
5 (#1,038,502)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Thomas W. Pogge
Yale University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references