Humanity’s End: Why We Should Reject Radical Human Enhancement [Book Review]

The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 17 (1):169-172 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,010

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Why We Should Not Pay for Human Organs.Francis L. Delmonico & Nancy Scheper-Hughes - 2002 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 2 (3):381-389.
Beyond Humanity? The Ethics of Biomedical Enhancement. [REVIEW]Ezra Sullivan - 2017 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 17 (1):172-176.
The End of Sex and the Future of Human Reproduction. [REVIEW]Norbert C. Oparaji - 2016 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 16 (4):733-735.
Genetic Technology, Enhancement, and Christian Values.Dónal P. O’Mathúna - 2002 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 2 (2):277-295.
Unfit for the Future: The Need for Moral Enhancement. [REVIEW]Basil Cole - 2017 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 17 (1):176-177.
Freedom at the End of Life.Christopher M. Saliga - 2006 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 6 (2):253-262.
Radical Social Policy at the United Nations.Austin Ruse - 2007 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 7 (1):25-30.
AGAR, Nicholas, Humanity's End: Why We Should Reject Radical Enhancement.Matt James - 2011 - Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 17 (1):133.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-06-29

Downloads
21 (#1,006,460)

6 months
5 (#1,042,355)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references