The Unique Intermediate Logic Whose Every Rule is Archetypal

Logic Journal of the IGPL 13 (3):269-275 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Informally, we can say that an inference rule is archetypal if any other rule can be transformed to it via some substitution for the propositional variables. It was shown by L. Humberstone that, in the case of classical propositional logic, every non-degenerate binary rule is archetypal and conjectured that this result holds also for all rules in the full language. In this paper we provide a proof of this conjecture and show that it is the unique intermediate logic with this property

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Classically archetypal rules.Tomasz Połacik & Lloyd Humberstone - 2018 - Review of Symbolic Logic 11 (2):279-294.
Uniqueness of normal proofs in implicational intuitionistic logic.Takahito Aoto - 1999 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 8 (2):217-242.
What is an inference rule?Ronald Fagin, Joseph Y. Halpern & Moshe Y. Vardi - 1992 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (3):1018-1045.
A mind of a non-countable set of ideas.Alexander Citkin - 2008 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 17 (1-2):23-39.
Lattice BCK logics with Modus Ponens as unique rule.Joan Gispert & Antoni Torrens - 2014 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 60 (3):230-238.
Archetypal forms of inference.Lloyd Humberstone - 2004 - Synthese 141 (1):45 - 76.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-04

Downloads
12 (#1,374,231)

6 months
10 (#418,198)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Classically archetypal rules.Tomasz Połacik & Lloyd Humberstone - 2018 - Review of Symbolic Logic 11 (2):279-294.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references