‘Content’ and ‘Degree of Confirmation’: A Reply to Dr Bar-Hillel

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 6 (22):157-163 (1955)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/bjps/vi.22.157

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,459

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Adequacy and consistency: A second reply to dr bar-Hillel.K. R. Popper - 1956 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 7 (27):249-256.
Popper Karl R.. Degree of confirmation. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 5 , pp. 143–149.Popper K. R.. Errata and corrigenda. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 5 , p. 359. [REVIEW]John G. Kemeny - 1955 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 20 (3):304-305.
The Popper-Carnap controversy.Alex C. Michalos - 1971 - The Hague,: M. Nijhoff.
Comments on 'degree of confirmation' by professor K. R. Popper.Yehoshua Bar-Hillel - 1955 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 6 (22):155-157.
Comments on `Degree of Confirmation' by Professor K. R. Popper.Jerusalem Bar-Hillel - 1955 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 6 (22):155.
The paradoxes of confirmation—a reply to dr Agassi.H. G. Alexander - 1959 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (39):229-234.
Content and degreb of confirmation: Further comments on probability and confirmation a rejoinder to professor Popper.Y. Bar-Hillel - 1956 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 7 (27):245-248.
David Miller. A paradox of information. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 1 , pp. 59–61. - Karl R. Popper. A comment on Miller's new paradox of information. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 1 , pp. 61–69. - Karl R. Popper. A paradox of zero information. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 2, pp. 141–143. - J. L. Mackie. Miller's so-called paradox of information.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 2, pp. 144–147. - David Miller. On a so-called so-called paradox: a reply to Professor J. L. Mackie.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 17 no. 2, pp. 147–149. - Jeffrey Bub and Michael Radner. Miller's paradox of information.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 19 no. 1 , pp. 63–67. - David Miller. The straight and narrow rule of induction: a reply to Dr Bub and Mr Radner.The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 19 no. 2, pp. 145. [REVIEW]Richard C. Jeffrey - 1970 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (1):124-127.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
96 (#221,040)

6 months
18 (#167,512)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Notes on probability and induction.Rudolf Carnap - 1973 - Synthese 25 (3-4):269 - 298.
Metaconfirmation.Denis Zwirn & Herv� P. Zwirn - 1996 - Theory and Decision 41 (3):195-228.
The Popper—Carnap controversy.J. G. Mcevoy - 1976 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 7 (1):63-85.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references